Jack Lab

Research

 

Our mission is to unlock the secrets of microbial population dynamics to increase plant health.

 

Linking functional and taxonomic diversity of diazotrophs under contrasting management regimes for enhanced crop productivity

Funded by USDA – NIFA Foundational Agriculture Award # 2021-67013-33677

This project will generate foundational knowledge using concepts in microbial evolutionary ecology to link the functional and taxonomic diversity of beneficial soil microbes to cropping systems. The project will measure how free-living nitrogen fixing bacteria (diazotroph) population dynamics respond to soil properties and agriculture management regimes, and document how community shifts translate into N-fixation activity over the growing season. We will determine whether potentially beneficial diazotrophs may have been lost through conventional agronomic management by using a prairie remnant as a baseline for community diversity. The knowledge gained could increase biological N-fixation rates as a means to decrease synthetic fertilizer dependence, which aligns with the program area priority to sustainably increase crop productivity. To accomplish our goals, we will spatiotemporally sample soils across Cook Agronomy Farm (CAF), which operates no-till and reduced till fields, to measure N-fixation and microbial communities. We will isolate free-living nitrogen-fixing strains from CAF, and characterize their metabolic diversity to assess the effect of nitrogen fertilizers. Strains will then be grown in competition with one another to predict the outcome of interactions in soil. We will test whether strains that fix more nitrogen show fitness costs and are less competitive when grown in the presence of mineral nitrogen sources, which we predict would both decrease diversity and lower fixation rates in the field. Finally, we will inoculate wheat in the greenhouse to assess competition in the rhizosphere and to measure the diazotroph microbiome’s influence on plant productivity.

 

 Induced versus constitutive response of plant defenses to insect herbivores across ranges

The invasion of novel environments by plants opens up opportunities for access to previously unavailable resources while also exposing the individuals to novel environmental threats. One such example of these types of threats are insect herbivores with which an introduced plant population has not co-evolved. The shifting defense hypothesis (SDH predicts that selection pressures on defensive traits will change over the course of an invasion; specifically, it predicts a shift away from more energetically expensive compounds that deter generalists and more specialized enemies to cheaper compounds that garner more broad spectrum protection. We tested these predictions by comparing feeding preferences of two herbivores on burr clover (Medicago polymorpha) genotypes from M. polymorpha’s native range around the Mediterranean and invasive range in the North and South America–neither herbivore occurs in the host plant’s native range but both are common in North and South America. We also compared the activity of peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and total protein production for host plant genotypes from the two ranges.

 

Transgenerational rhizobial selection in Trifolium barbigerum plants

This project aims to determine if Trifolium barbigerum (clover) hosts are more likely to partner with beneficial rhizobia they have had previous exposure to, even in the presence of higher N-fixing strains. Because the plant cannot assess the nitrogen-fixing ability of the rhizobia before nodule formation, it would be in the plant’s best interest to remember which strains were most helpful. Rhizobia strains were isolated from our field site in Bodega Bay, CA. Trifolium plants were inoculated with isolated strains to determine their effect on plant growth. Once beneficial and non-beneficial strains are determined, plants will be inoculated with a familiar and unfamiliar partner to see which strain is more prominent at harvest – and whether the plants can truly remember their friends!

 

The effect of varying nitrogen and carbon sources on mutant and wildtype strains of Azotobacter vinelandii

Azotobacter vinelandii is a free-living soil diazotroph with the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. We are investigating this organism with the goal of utilizing it as a biological fertilizer instead of costly chemical fertilizers. We use a microplate reader to render growth curves of wild type and mutant strains of Azotobacter vinelandii under varying types and concentrations of carbon and nitrogen sources. Using this method, we analyze the growth rates and carrying capacity of the strains in response to the media types. The goal of this project is to not only identify the ideal media, but to determine how growth is limited by carbon or nitrogen and how this affects the cost of nitrogen fixation.

 

Microbial Population Dynamics Between Cooperative and Non-cooperative Azotobacter vinelandii

Within the diverse ecosystem of crop and soil systems, nitrogen fixing diazotrophs and rhizobia will compete against non-fixing strains for resources. If the non-fixing strains dominate over the fixing strains, the benefits of nitrogen fixation would be removed from the plant. It is theorized that non-fixing strains can utilize the nitrogen fixed by others in order to “cheat” the system. To test this concept, wild type Azotobacter is co-cultured with mutant strains that over and under produce nitrogenase needed for biological nitrogen fixation. Strain percentages are determined after a period of growth to see if any strain was overcome by another and to what extent. The results of this experiment will have important implications for how the inoculation of crops with biological fertilizer in the form of microbes will benefit agricultural systems.

Dr Jack measuring wheat

Image 1 of 4

Azotobacter growth curves

Image 1 of 8