Changing world: Youth of mixed heritage

An interesting article on npr.com captures nicely the growing awareness of the limits of traditional definitions of race and ethnicity. The article, which comes from npr.com’s Race Card Project, discusses a blended family with two adolescent boys who are of mixed-heritage (their language). Per the author and the children’s mother, the two boys resist the notion imposed by society that they must choose one particular label or even a mixed-race, preferring the term “mixed-heritage.” As the number of inter-racial families grows, the numbers of children asserting biracial (or mixed) identities will also grow, and we will hopefully begin to see more research on the interesting psychological experiences that play out in the lives of these youths.

One interesting question for me is how parents and children who have different ethnic backgrounds discuss their differences (and similarities). In the npr article, the mother of the boys indicates feeling concern and guilt that one of her mixed-heritage children is developing an interest in sociology and the study of mixed-race youth. She wonders if his mixed-heritage is pushing him to pursue an interest that will not be lucrative. The article does not discuss how the family discusses this topic, nor the boy’s response to this interesting reaction by the mother. How families negotiate these conversations over time, taking into account developmental and contextual considerations, has yet to be well investigated.

 

Talking about race with children

A very interesting discussion on NPR regarding talking with children about race and racial identity. My quick read of the twitter postings seemed to indicate (unsurprisingly) that children of White families generally did not talk much about race and racial/identity, while children of racial/ethnic minority families did. The term “colorblind” was used a lot, which brings to mind the question of what a colorblind society might actually be. There is some interesting scholarship on this concept, some of which has argued convincingly that colorblind ideology perpetuates the racism/discrimination of our current society, because it denies the continued existence of structural inequalities that are race-based. This denial of structural inequalities, then, leads to individual-level interpretation of differences.

Thus, the reason that African American and Latino youth have lower academic achievement than White youth is due to something about them, their families, and their culture. A perspective that acknowledges the continued structural inequalities would point out that unequal policies that were sanctioned and implemented by the U.S. government led to poverty, exposure to violence, and marginalization for many racial/ethnic groups, all of which are associated with lower academic achievement. Further, these experiences continue to exist and are maintained by these inequalities, that although may not be sanctioned by the government, continue to exist through individual and community-level behavior. Consider the following question: why are schools so segregated by race/ethnicity if the segregation as a government policy is outlawed?

Twitter and racism

The media has been excitedly discussing all of the vitriolic tweets that were published following the recent Miss America contest, in which the winner was a woman of South Asian (Indian) descent. It seems that after she won, there were many racist tweets that the media felt obliged to note. I don’t quite understand the media’s fascination with this behavior — given the millions of tweets that are published each day, I would expect that a certain percentage of them would be hateful in some way or another. WIthout knowing the percentage of hateful tweets (as compared to the overall number), it is difficult to know how important/relevant any of this is. And by focusing on this behavior, news outlets are reinforcing it. Let’s move on.