Professor Kasmer's Ivanhoe Games

Professor Lisa Kasmer| Clark University | Worcester, MA | 01610

Introduction Rational

Professor M. Waldman teaches chemistry at the University of Ingolstadt. We first encounter him when Frankenstein attends his lecture by the recommendation of professor M. Krempe (29). In his lecture, Waldman discusses modern chemistry, and the fact that the “ancient teachers” of the field have promised unachievable and unrealistic results with future chemistry (29). Following that Waldman attempts to debunk the promises made by older experts of the field and make a more rational scientific promise to what chemistry can do. Waldman sees chemistry as a science, and from a scientist perspective, going against what many people at the time believed science could do and especially Frankenstein’s view of science from his former readings (28).

Frankenstein describes Waldman’s behavior as “mild” and “attractive” (30), with a sweet voice and general kindness (29-30). Waldman believes in Frankenstein’s ability to succeed (30), and recommends a list of books he should read. He emphasizes the importance of learning all branches of natural philosophy and not just chemistry (30), and offers Frankenstein the use of his laboratory. Waldman referrers to Frankenstein as his “disciple”, showing his closer relationship with him and his future influence over him. Frankenstein ends by stating that the day he met Professor Waldman has decided his future destiny (30).

Frankenstein referrers to a Waldman as his “ true friend” (31), a frank advisor with good nature and amiable character (31). Waldman expresses his “most heartfelt exultation” in Frankenstein’s progress (31), this even though not said by Waldman, shows his character and caring towards Frankenstein. Waldman’s caring and pride for Frankenstein hints at a closer relationship between Waldman and Frankenstein than just that of a teacher and a student. Later on, Waldman praises Frankenstein’s progress in the sciences (46), in what is described by Frankenstein as pure torture (46). Waldman does not take Frankenstein’s signs of hatred towards the sciences seriously, perhaps not wanting to believe someone so talented may be developing hatred towards the field.

This set of miscommunication between Frankenstein and Waldman, as well as the unreliable narration of the book from Victor Frankenstein point of view poses a challenge to understanding Waldman’s real character and intentions, as well as his relationship and view towards Frankenstein and his scientific experiments.

Introduction Rational